Follow up on the Leica M9-P
Dienstag, Januar 24, 2012 at 23:40 I had posted some thoughts on my switch from a Nikon D3s to the Leica M9-P and now it's time for a follow-up.
- I shoot significantly less images then before. This is a good thing as I spend more time before pressing the shutter button resulting in less post-processing work and better images.
- I still like the Leica M9-P with the 35mm lens. 35mm became my focal-length of choice.
- My photography got better since I have the M9, this however has little to do with the camera itself
- I got more shots which I really like than I lost due to the missing autofocus etc.
- I have the 90mm Summarit f/2.5 and its nearly impossible to get the focus right. I'm selling the lens on ebay now. The lens is great, but its very difficult to make correct focus decisions. This basically means that I can only use the Leica with focal lenses < 50mm.
- For actual work the Nikon D3s is the better choice, I definitely miss the 24-70mm/2.8 and 70-200mm/2.8 and the certainty that every images will be usable.
- I did a test-shoot with a Hasselblad H4D-40 and the 100mm/2.2 lens and while I liked some Leica images I loved nearly all Hasselblad pictures. Of course, this comparison is unfair, but I would have never thought that the difference is so big. The Leica made good quality images, the Hasselblads were exceptional.
comparison,
d3s,
h4d-40,
hasselblad,
leica,
m9,
m9p,
nikon in
Gear 