Comments on: High performance … delivered … http://www.linke.de/2009/03/27/high-performance-delivered/ Some random thoughts and links Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:36:21 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1-alpha By: Markus Linke http://www.linke.de/2009/03/27/high-performance-delivered/comment-page-1/#comment-524 Markus Linke Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:50:48 +0000 http://www.linke.de/?p=968#comment-524 Well ... of course one could think of situations where even the above might work, but the business-side of my blog is focussed on the financial services industry and these scripts are usually implemented in areas, where it is criticial for the client that they work 100% reliable at all times. I have no problem at all with someone who does not know how to write a script, but after some research on that person's side I would have expected a "oops, sorry, I was wrong and have it corrected now" rather than saying that other sources might be "misleading or plain wrong". It's that kind of attitude I have a problem with. Well … of course one could think of situations where even the above might work, but the business-side of my blog is focussed on the financial services industry and these scripts are usually implemented in areas, where it is criticial for the client that they work 100% reliable at all times. I have no problem at all with someone who does not know how to write a script, but after some research on that person's side I would have expected a “oops, sorry, I was wrong and have it corrected now” rather than saying that other sources might be “misleading or plain wrong”. It's that kind of attitude I have a problem with.

]]> By: MaxP http://www.linke.de/2009/03/27/high-performance-delivered/comment-page-1/#comment-523 MaxP Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:37:51 +0000 http://www.linke.de/?p=968#comment-523 SomeOneElse@accenture:<br><br>'#!' can be omitted if the script is made up of only system commands without internal SH directives.<br><br>How that script is supposed to be executed?<br>You're basically right, but what about execution like sh <script_name>? That line would be only a comment, correct? SomeOneElse@accenture:

'#!' can be omitted if the script is made up of only system commands without internal SH directives.

How that script is supposed to be executed?
You're basically right, but what about execution like sh <script_name>? That line would be only a comment, correct?

]]>